|
|
Post by I.M.Apologetics on Apr 11, 2008 23:19:25 GMT -5
no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver!
God help us!
|
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Apr 12, 2008 7:48:47 GMT -5
People will always do whatever they can to get us to not use the KJV, or other versions for that matter. people don't like the Word of God, Lost and Saved alike.
I'm still wondering about Joshua 31:1. Maybe it's not a real source because they made up a chapter and a verse, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Apr 12, 2008 9:37:45 GMT -5
Emily, dont you think it might be a good thing to investigate this issue yourself? I mean, if someone told me that my NAB had many corrupt or added verses , i would definatly look into it. And yes, im sure there are people out there that would make up things to get prots away from the KJB, but there are honest people out there, at least we hope:)
|
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Apr 12, 2008 9:38:57 GMT -5
Marcie, I believe there's a course on the KJV offered at my church. I will take it sometime.
|
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Apr 12, 2008 10:01:54 GMT -5
Sweety, you DONT go to your church to get an unbias truth. HELLO! But do as you will, im just trying to help you out. I dont know for myself if this is true or not, i really dont care since it does not concern me, but if it did, i know i would look elsewhere for my answers.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 12, 2008 16:39:04 GMT -5
It doesn't say it was corrupted...it just said word forms were changed. Joshua 31:1 isn't a verse.... There you go. This was posted by a Protestant (not by me). See how the confusion begins? |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 12, 2008 16:39:38 GMT -5
no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver! God help us! Digalo mano! |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 12, 2008 16:42:27 GMT -5
People will always do whatever they can to get us to not use the KJV, or other versions for that matter. people don't like the Word of God, Lost and Saved alike. I'm still wondering about Joshua 31:1. Maybe it's not a real source because they made up a chapter and a verse, lol. You mean Protestants will always do whatever they can to get you to stop placing your faith in a faulty translations? These are your spiritual brethren I quoted. Do you disagree with Protestants who have a Doctorate Degree in Theology? I know you value religious education. Do you pastors have an education as high as the Doctor of Theology that I quoted who proves that the KJV is based on corrupted translations and are therefore corrupted translations themselves? |
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Apr 12, 2008 16:42:29 GMT -5
Ingles por favor!!
Does anyone else find it weird that they quote Joshua 31:1....?
Yes, Protestants also.
I do not really care how high of an education one has. One of my mom's professors has corrupted her mind by telling her he believes (with all of his scholarly knowledge and doctarates) that Genesis is a myth.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 12, 2008 16:43:14 GMT -5
Emily, dont you think it might be a good thing to investigate this issue yourself? I mean, if someone told me that my NAB had many corrupt or added verses , i would definatly look into it. And yes, im sure there are people out there that would make up things to get prots away from the KJB, but there are honest people out there, at least we hope:) Especially since the people trying to get you away from the faulty translation are Protestant Theologians. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 12, 2008 16:44:22 GMT -5
Ingles por favor!! Joshua 31:1....?  You're in America! Get used to it! We can speak whatever language we want to speak here! LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 12, 2008 16:44:39 GMT -5
(U know I'm just playin' with ya!)
|
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Apr 12, 2008 16:47:16 GMT -5
I looked it up, whoever wrote the article meant Deuteronomy 31. Nice proof-reading whoever wrote it.
|
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan on Apr 12, 2008 21:26:31 GMT -5
heya Em,
Sooo if the KJV 1611 is so great what do you make of the opening introduction?
|
|
|
|
Post by knuckle on Apr 12, 2008 21:36:07 GMT -5
I would rank it evenly with the closing line of 2 maccabees
|
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan on Apr 12, 2008 21:59:32 GMT -5
I would rank it evenly with the closing line of 2 maccabees Your suspect Knuckles...SUSPECT!!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Apr 12, 2008 22:01:35 GMT -5
RSF-...Genesis 1....?
|
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 13, 2008 11:33:20 GMT -5
I looked it up, whoever wrote the article meant Deuteronomy 31. Nice proof-reading whoever wrote it. Again...they are Protestants. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Apr 13, 2008 11:34:08 GMT -5
heya Em, Sooo if the KJV 1611 is so great what do you make of the opening introduction? Why don't you post it here RSF.  |
|
|
|
Post by redsoxfan on Apr 13, 2008 13:18:52 GMT -5
No not Genesis 1. In the 1611 original copy there is a luminous praising episode of King James in the preface. The whole text reads very disturbingly to me as a Catholic. It seems more like fear mongering. To have a true 1611 KJV would be to have that original dedication. ~RSF |
|
