|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 2, 2009 22:56:30 GMT -5
I meant that black women get hired over white man/women down here. I was pretty sure that mexicans out numbered us by now, they keep multiplying by the hundreds!
Trust me i live it! I cant go to walmart without being followed around by some hispanic man, that prolly cant even speak a lick of english. Really is frustrating and discusting.
|
|
|
|
Post by teresahrc on Feb 3, 2009 16:55:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 19:00:08 GMT -5
I meant that black women get hired over white man/women down here. I was pretty sure that mexicans out numbered us by now, they keep multiplying by the hundreds! Trust me i live it! I cant go to walmart without being followed around by some hispanic man, that prolly cant even speak a lick of english. Really is frustrating and discusting. Well, don't forget...you are on "their" land after all. Remember, it was the Spanish who first settled the North America long before the Pilgrims set foot on Plymouth Rock. By the time they got their, The Spanish had flourishing towns and trade and a network of roads and magnificent Churches. I was arguing with these racists once and I used to get them so angry when I'd tell them that they (The Mexicans) were reconquering their land back. Texas "was" Mexico once. But it's just nature taking it's course...more and more minorities are out-reproducing non-minorities and non-minorities are having far less children. I believe that the last administration really dropped the ball on illegal immigration. The were so complacent. The refused to defend and completely exhonerrate those two border patrol agents who were jailed for defending themselves and for shooting an illegal immigrant drug dealer that had a van full of bricks of weed. But you know that those Bush boys love Mexican chicks. They even married a pair of them. But hey, nothing wrong with that and Bush's friends (big corporations) need that cheap immigrant labor. Fact is, if America "really" wanted to stop the illegals from coming in, we would've done it already (for heck's sake, we put a man on the moon). Our economy is too dependant on them. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 19:21:17 GMT -5
So, no opinions on Steele?
|
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 3, 2009 20:03:52 GMT -5
I meant that black women get hired over white man/women down here. I was pretty sure that mexicans out numbered us by now, they keep multiplying by the hundreds! Trust me i live it! I cant go to walmart without being followed around by some hispanic man, that prolly cant even speak a lick of english. Really is frustrating and discusting. Well, don't forget...you are on "their" land after all. Remember, it was the Spanish who first settled the North America long before the Pilgrims set foot on Plymouth Rock. By the time they got their, The Spanish had flourishing towns and trade and a network of roads and magnificent Churches. I was arguing with these racists once and I used to get them so angry when I'd tell them that they (The Mexicans) were reconquering their land back. Texas "was" Mexico once. But it's just nature taking it's course...more and more minorities are out-reproducing non-minorities and non-minorities are having far less children. I believe that the last administration really dropped the ball on illegal immigration. The were so complacent. The refused to defend and completely exhonerrate those two border patrol agents who were jailed for defending themselves and for shooting an illegal immigrant drug dealer that had a van full of bricks of weed. But you know that those Bush boys love Mexican chicks. They even married a pair of them. But hey, nothing wrong with that and Bush's friends (big corporations) need that cheap immigrant labor. Fact is, if America "really" wanted to stop the illegals from coming in, we would've done it already (for heck's sake, we put a man on the moon). Our economy is too dependant on them. Actually im not on "their" land at all, if anything im on the Indian's land. www.the-wild-west.co.uk/war-setllers.htmAnd this shows that hispanics are reproducing more than any ethncity.. www.hispanicmpr.com/images/20082/hmprcensus0607.jpgAlso, her is shows that we(america) have always used the english language! www.workings.com/LIA_His.htm |
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 3, 2009 20:06:08 GMT -5
So, no opinions on Steele? I think its good! Now i dont want to here you crying about the RNC being racists. Now their head guy is black! Yeah! |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 20:18:29 GMT -5
Well, don't forget...you are on "their" land after all. Remember, it was the Spanish who first settled the North America long before the Pilgrims set foot on Plymouth Rock. By the time they got their, The Spanish had flourishing towns and trade and a network of roads and magnificent Churches. I was arguing with these racists once and I used to get them so angry when I'd tell them that they (The Mexicans) were reconquering their land back. Texas "was" Mexico once. But it's just nature taking it's course...more and more minorities are out-reproducing non-minorities and non-minorities are having far less children. I believe that the last administration really dropped the ball on illegal immigration. The were so complacent. The refused to defend and completely exhonerrate those two border patrol agents who were jailed for defending themselves and for shooting an illegal immigrant drug dealer that had a van full of bricks of weed. But you know that those Bush boys love Mexican chicks. They even married a pair of them. But hey, nothing wrong with that and Bush's friends (big corporations) need that cheap immigrant labor. Fact is, if America "really" wanted to stop the illegals from coming in, we would've done it already (for heck's sake, we put a man on the moon). Our economy is too dependant on them. Actually im not on "their" land at all, if anything im on the Indian's land. www.the-wild-west.co.uk/war-setllers.htmWell, you do know that the 1/2 of Mexican blood is Native American right? And this shows that hispanics are reproducing more than any ethncity.. www.hispanicmpr.com/images/20082/hmprcensus0607.jpgYep! We're #1! (Because most of us are Catholic and don't believe in abortion and love having children!) It's only a matter of time before we take over! LOL! Also, her is shows that we(america) have always used the english language! www.workings.com/LIA_His.htmSince when? Remember, the first "Americans" (persons who settled this country and actually gave it it's name "America") were the Spaniards. It was already named "America" before any other European culture set foot here. They literally "came" to America. The Spaniards conquered and settled it. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 20:19:35 GMT -5
So, no opinions on Steele? I think its good! Now i dont want to here you crying about the RNC being racists. Now their head guy is black! Yeah! Would you say that his blackness had nothing to do with his being elected (remember, the last time they needed to go up against Obama, they chose a black guy...Steele). |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 20:26:09 GMT -5
So, no opinions on Steele? I think its good! Now i dont want to here you crying about the RNC being racists. Now their head guy is black! Yeah! Would you say that his blackness had nothing to do with his being elected (remember, the last time they needed to go up against Obama, they chose a black guy...Steele). "And" I think I did a good job of proving that racism is prevelant in both parties. Remember, the Republicans didn't pick a black Presidential candidate (and up until now, never had ANY black leaders). There are racist Dems & Repubs. Racists are like Jelly Beans...they come in all colors. But, in this country, there were actual laws that were racist in the not too distant past. Today, they scoot by it by not paying blacks the same that they pay whites (when both are equally qualified). Racists will always find a way to hold the brother man down! ;D And as long as their in power, the brother man has to take it (that is until the over birthing of good Catholic Hispanics and the sinful abortion of White Anglo Saxon Protestants takes it's toll and we overrun the country with brownies! LOL!)! ;D This is such a fun thread! I'm saying the stupidest things I can think of! Ya'll better be laughing at me! LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 20:27:40 GMT -5
So, no opinions on Steele? I think its good! Now i dont want to here you crying about the RNC being racists. Now their head guy is black! Yeah! OMGosh! Here's a GREAT question that I know NO Republican supporter here will answer! LMBO! Do you think that Michael Steele was the BEST qualified candidate to lead the "family values" Republican Party? (Remember, he's NOT Pro-Life!) I'm going to love this! ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 3, 2009 21:33:54 GMT -5
Since when? Remember, the first "Americans" (persons who settled this country and actually gave it it's name "America") were the Spaniards. It was already named "America" before any other European culture set foot here. They literally "came" to America. The Spaniards conquered and settled it. Ok, if the Spaniards had to conquere the land, who did they conquere? The Native Americans? |
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 3, 2009 21:36:04 GMT -5
I think its good! Now i dont want to here you crying about the RNC being racists. Now their head guy is black! Yeah! Would you say that his blackness had nothing to do with his being elected (remember, the last time they needed to go up against Obama, they chose a black guy...Steele). I love the way you are so concerned about the color of everyones skin, you are kinda obsessed about it. Can we have a discussion without naming a persons ethnicity?  |
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 3, 2009 21:41:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 22:47:13 GMT -5
I can't see videos yet, but you admit that they picked someone "less" qualified? Sounds strangely like affirmative action. So, if it wasn't affirmative action and if it wasn't because he was the best qualified candidate or if it wasn't because he was black, why did they choose him?  |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 22:50:13 GMT -5
Would you say that his blackness had nothing to do with his being elected (remember, the last time they needed to go up against Obama, they chose a black guy...Steele). I love the way you are so concerned about the color of everyones skin, you are kinda obsessed about it. Can we have a discussion without naming a persons ethnicity? LOL! Hello? Earth to CC! That's the topic here! Steele's ethinicity and if it plays a part in his having been chosen to lead Republicans. Ok, so, how do you feel about his being Pro-Choice then? You do know that he's Pro-Choice, right? Republicans chose a Pro-Choice man to be their leader again (just like they did with John McCain), so now, they can't pretend to say that they were duped by McCain. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 3, 2009 22:54:54 GMT -5
Since when? Remember, the first "Americans" (persons who settled this country and actually gave it it's name "America") were the Spaniards. It was already named "America" before any other European culture set foot here. They literally "came" to America. The Spaniards conquered and settled it. Ok, if the Spaniards had to conquere the land, who did they conquere? The Native Americans? Yep. They didn't want to kill them. They needed them to mine the gold, but they caught colds from the Spaniards and died. That's when they began to bring blacks to America. Fact is, blacks and Spaniards were living here like a hundred years before whites. And again, Spaniards were the one's who actually named this great country. Do you know how many of the states of this country are actually Spanish names? Over 10%. Colorado Nevada New Mexico Arizona Montana California Florida |
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 4, 2009 0:27:42 GMT -5
I can't see videos yet, but you admit that they picked someone "less" qualified? Sounds strangely like affirmative action. So, if it wasn't affirmative action and if it wasn't because he was the best qualified candidate or if it wasn't because he was black, why did they choose him? Thats Politics! |
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Feb 4, 2009 0:43:17 GMT -5
Ok, if the Spaniards had to conquere the land, who did they conquere? The Native Americans? Yep. They didn't want to kill them. They needed them to mine the gold, but they caught colds from the Spaniards and died. That's when they began to bring blacks to America. Fact is, blacks and Spaniards were living here like a hundred years before whites. And again, Spaniards were the one's who actually named this great country. Do you know how many of the states of this country are actually Spanish names? Over 10%. Colorado Nevada New Mexico Arizona Montana California Florida Thats terrific, i guess the other 90% where named after anglos? But, spainish people came from SPAIN, not MEXICO. Down here in tx, we have alot of mexicans that border hop, and cant speak any english. Do you know how frustrating it is to be at the grocery store and the 6yr old mexican child is having to translate for the parent just to figure out how to pay the cashier. Its redicules to me. If you want to be here so bad, learn the language, thats it. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 4, 2009 1:13:16 GMT -5
I can't see videos yet, but you admit that they picked someone "less" qualified? Sounds strangely like affirmative action. So, if it wasn't affirmative action and if it wasn't because he was the best qualified candidate or if it wasn't because he was black, why did they choose him? Thats Politics! So "why" did they choose him then? LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Feb 4, 2009 1:16:58 GMT -5
[ Thats terrific, i guess the other 90% where named after anglos? "After" it was discovered and settled by Americanos.  I guess that's how the native born Americans felt about the Germans and the Polish and the Swiss that came here too. And...why would that bother you? If they were Hindu Indians, would it bother you that their children translated for them? Which "language"? Native American?  |
|
