Post by Ramon on May 14, 2009 12:29:39 GMT -5
Hello,
After a recent debate with a Protestant about Matthew 23:8-10, I believe it will be good to use Matthew 23:8-10 in it's proper context.
"But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ." (Matthew 23:8-10).
What did Christ' mean? Are we suppose to take Christ' words literally? Let see how the Holy Apostles understood Christ' declaration.
Saint Paul told the Early Christians that he was there Father. Was Saint Paul wrong?
The word "Father" and "Child" was used by the Holy Apostles, not always denoting a blood relation (i.e., Acts 7:2; 22:1; 14, 1 John 2:13, 1 Cor. 4:15, 1 Cor. 4:17, Phil. 2:22, Philemon 10, 1 Tim. 1:2,18). Saint Paul was the Early Christians Spiritual Father in the faith, as he told them (1 Cor 4:15).
Saint Peter (and Saint John) called David "Father" and called the OT Patriarchs "Fathers" (Acts 3:13,25; 5:30, Acts 4:25).
Read Acts 7:11-12, 15,19,38,44-45,51-52 (Stephen refers to our "fathers" in the faith), Acts 7:32 (Stephen calls God the God of our "fathers.") and Acts 13:17,32,36; 24:14; 26:6; 28:17,25 (Saint Paul also refers to the God of our "fathers" in the faith). Read Rom. 4:1 (Saint Paul calls Abraham our "forefather.), Rom. 4:16-17 (Saint Paul says that Abraham is the "father" of us all and the "father" of many nations), and Rom. 9:10 (Saint Paul calls Isaac, a spiritual leader, our "forefather"). Saint James called Abraham "our Father" (James 2:21). Read Acts 22:3 (Saint Paul says he was educated according to the strict law of our "fathers"). Read 1 Peter 1:18, 2 Peter 3:4 (Saint Peter talked about our "Fathers"). Apparently, Christ' disciples err right?
The Holy Apostles did not took Christ' words literally.
How about "teachers"? In the church at Antioch certain men were called "prophets and teachers" (Acts 13:1). Saint Paul not only recognized teachers as gifts of God to the Church (1 Cor 12:28; Eph 4:11), but he also did not hesitate to call himself "a teacher of the Gentiles." (2 Tim 1:11). Another reason why not to take Christ' words literally! Saint Paul didn't!
If we take the verses at face value, then we can't called our biological dad "Father". But did not Christ told us to "honor our Father and Mother"? Christ used the word "Father" to refer to spiritual leaders (Matt. 3:9; Luke 3:8, Luke 16:24,30).
If we read Scriptures as whole, then we got to conclude the following:
A) Christ contradicted himself.
B) The Holy Apostles strayed away from Christ' teaching.
C) The Holy Bible can err.
However, if we read Christ' words within context, while reading Scriptures as a whole and within the Living Tradition of the Church, then Christ was not talking literally. He was using hyperbole. Jesus was discouraging His followers from elevating the scribes and Pharisees to the titles of “fathers” and “rabbis” because they were hypocrites. Christ was against the Jewish leaders because they did not practice what they preach, but they demand there fellow man to lavish them with special titles. Christ was not against the titles per se.
What about the Holy Fathers of the Church? The Constant Tradition of the Church for the past 2,000 years has understood Christ' words the same way as the Holy Apostles. For the past 2,000 years, we have called our spiritual leaders "Fathers". Some women has be called "Mothers" for there purity in the Faith.
Non-Catholic/Orthodox tend to interpret Scriptures while ignoring or reject other Scriptures entirely.
For further reading, please read www.synaxis.org/callnoman.htm (Why Orthodox Call their Pastor "Father")
I find it amusing how non-Orthodox interpret Scriptures. After coming to Orthodoxy, I consider myself stupid in my Protestant years. I can't believe what I believed and how I interpreted Scriptures. I was living in a delusion!
Scriptures needs to interpret within the Church and by the Church.
In IC.XC,
Ramon
After a recent debate with a Protestant about Matthew 23:8-10, I believe it will be good to use Matthew 23:8-10 in it's proper context.
"But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ." (Matthew 23:8-10).
What did Christ' mean? Are we suppose to take Christ' words literally? Let see how the Holy Apostles understood Christ' declaration.
Saint Paul told the Early Christians that he was there Father. Was Saint Paul wrong?
The word "Father" and "Child" was used by the Holy Apostles, not always denoting a blood relation (i.e., Acts 7:2; 22:1; 14, 1 John 2:13, 1 Cor. 4:15, 1 Cor. 4:17, Phil. 2:22, Philemon 10, 1 Tim. 1:2,18). Saint Paul was the Early Christians Spiritual Father in the faith, as he told them (1 Cor 4:15).
Saint Peter (and Saint John) called David "Father" and called the OT Patriarchs "Fathers" (Acts 3:13,25; 5:30, Acts 4:25).
Read Acts 7:11-12, 15,19,38,44-45,51-52 (Stephen refers to our "fathers" in the faith), Acts 7:32 (Stephen calls God the God of our "fathers.") and Acts 13:17,32,36; 24:14; 26:6; 28:17,25 (Saint Paul also refers to the God of our "fathers" in the faith). Read Rom. 4:1 (Saint Paul calls Abraham our "forefather.), Rom. 4:16-17 (Saint Paul says that Abraham is the "father" of us all and the "father" of many nations), and Rom. 9:10 (Saint Paul calls Isaac, a spiritual leader, our "forefather"). Saint James called Abraham "our Father" (James 2:21). Read Acts 22:3 (Saint Paul says he was educated according to the strict law of our "fathers"). Read 1 Peter 1:18, 2 Peter 3:4 (Saint Peter talked about our "Fathers"). Apparently, Christ' disciples err right?
The Holy Apostles did not took Christ' words literally.
How about "teachers"? In the church at Antioch certain men were called "prophets and teachers" (Acts 13:1). Saint Paul not only recognized teachers as gifts of God to the Church (1 Cor 12:28; Eph 4:11), but he also did not hesitate to call himself "a teacher of the Gentiles." (2 Tim 1:11). Another reason why not to take Christ' words literally! Saint Paul didn't!
If we take the verses at face value, then we can't called our biological dad "Father". But did not Christ told us to "honor our Father and Mother"? Christ used the word "Father" to refer to spiritual leaders (Matt. 3:9; Luke 3:8, Luke 16:24,30).
If we read Scriptures as whole, then we got to conclude the following:
A) Christ contradicted himself.
B) The Holy Apostles strayed away from Christ' teaching.
C) The Holy Bible can err.
However, if we read Christ' words within context, while reading Scriptures as a whole and within the Living Tradition of the Church, then Christ was not talking literally. He was using hyperbole. Jesus was discouraging His followers from elevating the scribes and Pharisees to the titles of “fathers” and “rabbis” because they were hypocrites. Christ was against the Jewish leaders because they did not practice what they preach, but they demand there fellow man to lavish them with special titles. Christ was not against the titles per se.
What about the Holy Fathers of the Church? The Constant Tradition of the Church for the past 2,000 years has understood Christ' words the same way as the Holy Apostles. For the past 2,000 years, we have called our spiritual leaders "Fathers". Some women has be called "Mothers" for there purity in the Faith.
Non-Catholic/Orthodox tend to interpret Scriptures while ignoring or reject other Scriptures entirely.
For further reading, please read www.synaxis.org/callnoman.htm (Why Orthodox Call their Pastor "Father")
I find it amusing how non-Orthodox interpret Scriptures. After coming to Orthodoxy, I consider myself stupid in my Protestant years. I can't believe what I believed and how I interpreted Scriptures. I was living in a delusion!
Scriptures needs to interpret within the Church and by the Church.
In IC.XC,
Ramon