|
|
Post by teresahrc on Jul 24, 2009 22:03:59 GMT -5
Why do anti-catholics practice post-16th century Christian traditions, but reject pre- 16th century traditions?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ramon on Jul 25, 2009 0:28:17 GMT -5
Why do anti-catholics practice post-16th century Christian traditions, but reject pre- 16th century traditions? Because according to them, pre-16th century traditions were all corruptions that was entered into Christianity by the pagan Roman Catholic Church. Apparently, some believe the Holy Spirit was absent for 1,500 years, and then came back to lead Protestants to the truth. If that's true, He did a very bad job! ;D It's very interesting that many Protestants accept certain traditions not found the Holy Bible, such as altar calls, sinner's prayer, among other things. But then these same Evangelicals want to criticize the Orthodox or Catholics churches for believing and practicing non-biblical things. In IC.XC, Ramon |
|
|
|
Post by cradlecathlic27 on Jul 26, 2009 20:52:33 GMT -5
I dont understand the whole pri tribe stuff...
|
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Jul 28, 2009 8:19:49 GMT -5
Why do anti-catholics practice post-16th century Christian traditions, but reject pre- 16th century traditions? I'd love to see a non-Catholic Christian answer this one.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Jul 28, 2009 9:07:40 GMT -5
Why do anti-catholics practice post-16th century Christian traditions, but reject pre- 16th century traditions? Because according to them, pre-16th century traditions were all corruptions that was entered into Christianity by the pagan Roman Catholic Church. Apparently, some believe the Holy Spirit was absent for 1,500 years, and then came back to lead Protestants to the truth. If that's true, He did a very bad job! ;D In IC.XC, Ramon So, all their doctrines (which by the way, they based on ours/Salvation/Justification/The Holy Trinity...etc...) not to mention The Holy Bible came from a corrupt Church?  |
|
