|
|
Post by teresahrc on Jun 8, 2009 17:16:18 GMT -5
I'm still waiting on a pro-life democrat to run for President. As long as republicans continue with their pro-war, pro-death penalty and pro-capitalist agenda, I cannot vote republican. And I cannot vote democratic as long as they push their pro-abortion agenda.
There are more than 2 parties people!
|
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Jun 8, 2009 18:15:25 GMT -5
A pro-life, anti-gay marriage democrat would be great  |
|
|
|
Post by teresahrc on Jun 8, 2009 18:25:24 GMT -5
A pro-life, anti-war, anti-every kind of death and killing democrat would be great too. But the problem is that somehow pro-choice has been put on the democratic checklist. If all these disillusioned pro-life Rep. would just hop over to the Dem. side and demand a pro-life candidate, that could be possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Jun 9, 2009 11:21:14 GMT -5
I'm still waiting on a pro-life democrat to run for President. As long as republicans continue with their pro-war, pro-death penalty and pro-capitalist agenda, I cannot vote republican. And I cannot vote democratic as long as they push their pro-abortion agenda. There are more than 2 parties people! Me too...with 51% of The Country under President Obama NOW being against abortion, at least things are going in the right direction (as they are with everything else). Sometimes I wonder if he purposely made those radical Pro-Choice decisions to manipulate Pro-Lifers into more aggressive action so that he could set up the stage to repeal Roe V Wade. Think about it, he's appointing a Pro-Life Catholic to the Supreme Court. A little machiavellian move there? His rhetoric doesn't match his actions.  |
|
|
|
Post by teresahrc on Jun 9, 2009 12:28:42 GMT -5
I don't know,
But what's the deal with this threat of a second civil war?
|
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Jun 9, 2009 12:29:44 GMT -5
There is? Between whom and over what?
|
|
|
|
Post by teresahrc on Jun 9, 2009 12:38:08 GMT -5
Abortion
for and against of course
|
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Jun 9, 2009 12:42:35 GMT -5
A civil war? Like the first one? I'm confused....
|
|
|
|
Post by teresahrc on Jun 9, 2009 12:55:54 GMT -5
Civil war means a war fought by people in the same country--against each other.
No, the first civil war was about slavery and states vs federal gov. etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by emily445455 on Jun 9, 2009 14:30:53 GMT -5
Yes Yes, I know what it is. I am just confused.
The 1st Civil War was faught physically on two seperate parts of the country....I just don't understand how a war over abortion would be faught physically.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Jun 9, 2009 16:08:26 GMT -5
Yes Yes, I know what it is. I am just confused. The 1st Civil War was faught physically on two seperate parts of the country....I just don't understand how a war over abortion would be faught physically. What do you think shooting abortion doctors is and blowing up abortion clinics is? That's domestic terrorism. That's war. That's an insurgency. |
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Jun 9, 2009 16:33:31 GMT -5
I'm still waiting on a pro-life democrat to run for President. As long as republicans continue with their pro-war, pro-death penalty and pro-capitalist agenda, I cannot vote republican. And I cannot vote democratic as long as they push their pro-abortion agenda. There are more than 2 parties people! His rhetoric doesn't match his actions. That's because he is a liar. |
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Jun 9, 2009 16:35:50 GMT -5
Civil war means a war fought by people in the same country--against each other. No, the first civil war was about slavery and states vs federal gov. etc. Yes, and the Southern States had a right to secede from the Union like the Constitution says. Lincoln was wrong to force them back into the Union. |
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Jun 9, 2009 16:36:26 GMT -5
Civil war means a war fought by people in the same country--against each other. No, the first civil war was about slavery and states vs federal gov. etc. Yes, and the Southern States had a right to secede from the Union like the Constitution states. Lincoln was wrong to force them back into the Union. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Jun 9, 2009 16:36:46 GMT -5
His rhetoric doesn't match his actions. That's because he is a liar. Then, he's lieing in the right direction with Judge Sotomayor when it comes to abortion. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Jun 9, 2009 16:38:06 GMT -5
Civil war means a war fought by people in the same country--against each other. No, the first civil war was about slavery and states vs federal gov. etc. Yes, and the Southern States had a right to secede from the Union like the Constitution says. Lincoln was wrong to force them back into the Union. Then maybe they should've "won" the war if they wanted to be free so badly! ;D That war reminds me of when a bad kid runs amock and the mother grabs him by the ear and twists it so hard he walks on his tippy toes! LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Jun 9, 2009 16:38:08 GMT -5
If all these disillusioned pro-life Rep. would just hop over to the Dem. side Not on your Nelly! |
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Jun 9, 2009 16:46:22 GMT -5
Yes Yes, I know what it is. I am just confused. The 1st Civil War was faught physically on two seperate parts of the country....I just don't understand how a war over abortion would be faught physically. What do you think shooting abortion doctors is and blowing up abortion clinics is? That's domestic terrorism. That's war. That's an insurgency. Well, according to your line of reasoning Obama is faking it when he said it was an outrage for Tiller to be murdered. What Obama really meant was he was glad Tiller got blown away. So for once in my life I agree with Obama. I am outraged by doctor Tillers death. |
|
|
|
Post by Cepha on Jun 9, 2009 17:00:35 GMT -5
What do you think shooting abortion doctors is and blowing up abortion clinics is? That's domestic terrorism. That's war. That's an insurgency. Well, according to your line of reasoning Obama is faking it when he said it was an outrage for Tiller to be murdered. What Obama really meant was he was glad Tiller got blown away. So for once in my life I agree with Obama. I am outraged by doctor Tillers death. So, you're happy that Tiller was murdered?  You need to repent and come to Obama. |
|
|
|
Post by alfie on Jun 9, 2009 17:14:35 GMT -5
Well, according to your line of reasoning Obama is faking it when he said it was an outrage for Tiller to be murdered. What Obama really meant was he was glad Tiller got blown away. So for once in my life I agree with Obama. I am outraged by doctor Tillers death. So, you're happy that Tiller was murdered? You need to repent and come to Obama. I am happy babies have been saved from being murdered. |
|
